METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE INTERACTION OF OFFICIALS IN THE PROCESS OF CRIMINALISTIC PREVENTION OF PENITENTIARY CRIMES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the consideration of the main forms of interaction between law enforcement officials in the process of identifying and eliminating the circumstances that contributed to the commission of crimes committed by convicts in correctional institutions. The purpose of the study is to identify the main forms of interaction and classify them according to the criminal procedure basis. As a result, it has been established that the interaction of officials in the process of criminalistic prevention of penitentiary crimes is an activity of various entities based on normative acts, coordinated in terms of goals, objectives, and situation, aimed at identifying and eliminating the circumstances that contributed to the commission of penitentiary crimes.

Keywords:
interaction, official, prevention, detection, investigation, crime, convict, correctional institution
Text
Text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Vrublevskaya O. A. O suschnosti ponyatiya «social'noe vzaimodeystvie» v nauchnyh issledovaniyah // Vestnik Sibirskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta imeni akademika M. F. Reshetneva. 2006. № 5(12). S. 60–65.

2. Belkin R. S. Kurs kriminalistiki. 3-e izd., dop. M. : Yurist', 2001. 837 s.

3. Limpinskiy F. V., Antonov O. Yu. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya s operativnymi podrazdeleniyami FSIN Rossii pri rassledovanii prestupleniy, sovershennyh licami, soderzhaschimisya v uchrezhdeniyah ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy (na primere praktiki Permskogo kraya) // Rassledovanie prestupleniy: problemy i puti ih resheniya. 2021. № 4(34). S. 71–75.

4. Shuruhnov N. G. Dolzhnostnoe lico organa doznaniya – organa ispolnitel'noy vlasti (ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy) kak nositel' processual'nyh polnomochiy // Vedomosti ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy. 2023. № 9(256). S. 49–57.

5. Gir'ko S. I. Vozvraschenie ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sisteme Rossiyskoy Federacii processual'nyh polnomochiy: etapnost' i posledovatel'nost' shagov // Vedomosti ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy. 2021. № 3(226). S. 6–14.

6. Gavrilov B. Ya. Aktual'nye voprosy deyatel'nosti organov i uchrezhdeniy ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sistemy kak organov doznaniya // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema Rossiyskoy Federacii: voprosy ispolneniya ugolovnyh nakazaniy, realizacii mer probacii, vzaimodeystviya s publichnoy vlast'yu i institutami grazhdanskogo obsche- stva : sb. tez. vystup. i dokl. uchastnikov Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., priurochennoy k 90-letiyu so dnya obrazovaniya Akademii FSIN Rossii. Ryazan', 2024. S. 81–86.

7. Bosak E. E., Holopova E. N. Vzaimodeystvie sledovatelya s operativnymi podrazdeleniyami ispravitel'nyh uchrezhdeniy. M. : Yurlitinform, 2019. 166 s.

8. Bessonov A. A. Kriminalistika na zaschite rossiyskih tradicionnyh duhovno-nravstvennyh cennostey // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2025. T. 29, № 1. S. 17–26.

9. Borodulin V. V., Il'ichev N. N., Solov'ev V. I. Organizacionno-takticheskie dey- stviya operativnogo sotrudnika organov vnutrennih del na meste proisshestviya pri raskrytii ubiystva : metod. posobie. Domodedovo, 2003. 38 s.

10. Agarkov A. V. Osobennosti osuschestvleniya operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy v ugolovno-ispolnitel'noy sisteme // Ius Publicum et Privatum. 2022. № 5(20). S. 60–66.

11. Gavrilin Yu. V., Shuruhnov V. A. Nekotorye problemy organizacii vzaimodeystviya organov rassledovaniya s podrazdeleniyami FSIN i puti ih razresheniya // Ugolovno-ispolnitel'naya sistema: pravo, ekonomika, upravlenie. 2015. № 4. S. 10–14.

12. Grishin D. A., Shuruhnov N. G. O konvertacii rezul'tatov proizvodstva operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy v dokazatel'stva // Aktual'nye problemy nauki i praktiki XXI veka : materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. Ryazan', 2016. S. 109–112.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?