SYSTEM OF STATE COMPULSION IMPLEMENTED IN PENAL BODIES AND AUTHORITIES: THEORETICAL AND METHODO- LOGICAL ASPECTS
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
The article deals with various doctrinal approaches to the content and mechanism of state compulsion implementation in the activities of penal bodies and authorities. The system analysis of such structures as compulsion, forms and measures of state compulsion is carried out. On the basis of this analysis specific features are stated that characterize the system of state compulsion implementation in the activities of the bodies and institutions of the Federal Penal Service. State compulsion in the penal system is aimed at specific social purpose which can be formulated as provision of public security. The main part of the measures of state compulsion implemented in the penal system bodies and institutions activities (searches, inspections, seizure of certain items) is used exclusively to ensure the conditions and procedures for sentence serving established by the state through unilateral decisions and actions of officials in regards to free citizens, convicted persons and persons detained who fulfill legal regulations conscientiously.State compulsion in the penal system includes the following types of compulsion:regime-disciplinary (penal) one implemented by the Federal service staff for the execution of sentences in respect of persons convicted to deprivation of liberty;control and disciplinary one in relation to persons sentenced to punishment without isolation from society;administrative one in respect of citizens and legal entities;service-disciplinary one in respect of employees who have committed a disciplinary offence. The measures of state compulsion applied by the staff of the penal system are implemented in the majority of cases on the penal institutional territory and the adjacent territorywhere regime requirements have effect.

Keywords:
state compulsion, penal system, forms and measures of state compulsion
References

1. Social'noe upravlenie : slovar' / pod red. V. I. Dobren'kova, I. M. Slepenkova. M., 1994. 208 s

2. Dzherri D. Bol'shoy tolkovyy sociologicheskiy slovar' : v 2 t. M., 2001. T. 2. 528 s

3. Louson T., Gerrod Dzh. Sociologiya. A-Ya : slovar'-spravochnik. M., 2000. 608 s

4. Latushkin M. A. K voprosu o ponyatiyah gosudarstvennogo, pravovogo i gosudarstvenno- pravovogo prinuzhdeniya // Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2010. № 2. S. 186-196

5. Leyst O. E. Sankcii v sovetskom prave. M., 1962

6. Gurevich T. S. Sankcii za narushenie planovo-dogovornyh obyazatel'stv v narodnom hozyaystve M., 1976. 160 s

7. Zhicinskiy Yu. S. Sankciya normy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Voronezh, 1968. 123 s

8. Veremeenko I. I. Administrativno-pravovye sankcii. M., 1975. 192 s

9. Kaplunov A. I. Ob osnovnyh chertah i ponyatii gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2004. № 12. S. 10-17

10. Kozulin A. I. Pravovoe prinuzhdenie (pravovye nachala gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya v sovetskom obschestve) : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Sverdlovsk, 1986. 16 s

11. Zharenov I. P. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie v usloviyah demokratizacii obschestva : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2006. 145 s

12. Chashnikov V. A. Gosudarstvenno-pravovoe prinuzhdenie: obscheteoreticheskie voprosy : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ekaterinburg, 2006. 225 s

13. Guschina N. A. Suschnostnaya priroda pravovogo prinuzhdeniya i pooschreniya v sovremennom rossiyskom zakonodatel'stve // Pravo i politika. 2006. № 8. S. 82-89

14. Bahrah D. N. Prinuzhdenie i otvetstvennost' po administrativnomu pravu : ucheb. posobie. Ekaterinburg, 1999. 120 s

15. Kozlov Yu. M., Popov L. L. Administrativnoe pravo Rossii : uchebnik. M., 1999. 520 s

16. Kononov P. I. Zakonodatel'stvo ob administrativnom prinuzhdenii: problemy kodifikacii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 1998. № 8. S. 26-32

17. Satina E. A. Ponyatie i vidy gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya // Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya : Gumanitarnye nauki. 2003. № 2(30). S. 72-76

18. Hidekel' B. Z. Grazhdanskoe obschestvo i gosudarstvo // Politicheskaya sociologiya. Rostov n/D, 2001. 285 s

19. Talyupa A. G. Ubezhdenie i prinuzhdenie v period perehoda ot socializma k kommunizmu i ih rol' v obespechenii sovetskogo pravoporyadka : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1966. 21 s

20. Bazylev B. T. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie i pravovye formy ego osuschestvleniya v sovetskom obschestve : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Kiev, 1968. 17 s

21. Bratus' S. N. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost' i zakonnost' (ocherk teorii). M., 1976. 208 s

22. Kozhevnikov S. N. Social'noe naznachenie, struktura i formy gosudarstvennogo prinuzhdeniya // Sbornik uchenyh trudov Sverdlovskogo yuridicheskogo instituta. Sverdlovsk, 1973. Vyp. 22. 260 s

23. Makareyko N. V. Gosudarstvennoe prinuzhdenie kak sredstvo obespecheniya obschestvennogo poryadka : dis. … kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod, 1996. 19 s

24. Miroshnik M. A. Teoreticheskie aspekty ponyatiya prinuzhdeniya (v ramkah civilisticheskogo issledovaniya prinuzhdeniya) // Sovremennye paradigmy nauchnyh vozzreniy : sb. nauch. st. po itogam Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Sankt-Peterburg, 27-28 fevr. 2016 g.). SPb., 2016. S. 174-178

25. Grishin D. A. K voprosu o ponyatii i soderzhanii administrativnogo prinuzhdeniya, primenyaemogo sotrudnikami FSIN Rossii // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2016. № 1. S. 33-38

Login or Create
* Forgot password?