UDK 343.92 Влияние внешнего окружения на преступность. Влияние времени года, географического положения и т.п.
The article discusses some issues that have arisen in practice regarding the simultaneous functioning of two mechanisms for bringing to public liability for violation of the procedure and deadlines for submitting information (documents) in the compulsory insurance system, one of which is provided for by Federal Law No. 27-FZ of April 1, 1996 “On Individual (Personalized) Accounting in Compulsory Pension Insurance systems and compulsory social insurance”, the other is Article 15.33.2 of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. The law enforcement practice of the implementation of both mechanisms is investigated, as well as some theoretical and practical issues of consistency and proportionality of legislative regulation establishing both mechanisms.
administrative offense, insurance, violation of social security guarantees, public liability
1. Afanas'ev, S. 2019, ‘Review of Legal Positions in the Decisions of the Constitutional Court of Russia’, Comparative Constitutional Review, iss. 2, pp. 139-154.
2. Beljaninova, Ju. V. n.d., ‘Commentary to Federal Law No. 27-FZ of April 1, 1996 “On Individual (Personalized) accounting in the compulsory Pension Insurance system” (article-by- article)’, Legal Reference System “ConsultantPlus”, viewed 22 November 2022.
3. Knjazev, S. D. 2022, ‘Once again on the codification of legislation on administrative responsibility in the context of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation’, Administrative Law and Process, iss. 2, pp. 6-14.
4. Martasov, D. 2020, ‘Changing the concept of the Administrative Code’, Labor Law, iss. 3, pp. 87-94.
5. Nobel', A. R. 2022, ‘Implementation of the principle of non bis in idem when bringing to public liability’, Actual problems of Russian law, iss. 3, pp. 11-18.
6. Nogina, O. A. 2012, State extra-budgetary funds as part of the budget system of Russia: problems of Legal regulation, Statute, Moscow.
7. Tjapuhin, S. V.2021, ‘Review of arbitration practice’, Remuneration in a state (municipal) institution: accounting and taxation, iss. 2, pp. 49-53.
8. Tjapuhin, S. V. 2020, ‘A mistake in the form of a CV-M: what are the consequences?’,Remuneration of labor in a state (municipal) institution: accounting and taxation, iss. 3, pp. 58-61.
9. Jachmenev, G. G. 2022, ‘Some issues of application of the general provisions of the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation in the practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (2019-2021)’, Arbitration disputes, iss. 2, pp. 62-146.
10. Chistjakova, L. V. (ed.) n.d., ‘Article-by-article commentary to the Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation’, Legal Reference System “ConsultantPlus”, viewed 29 November 2022.
