The article is devoted to solving a number of legal and theoretical issues of operational implementation, taking into account the vision of the problem by employees of bodies authorized to carry out operational investigative activities and subjects of criminal proceedings. Despite a fairly reliable legal basis for conducting such a complex and multifaceted operational investigative event as operational implementation, there are gaps and conflicts in legislation, as well as shortcomings in the legal regulation of operational investigative activities. At the departmental (interdepartmental) level it is concluded that these negative circumstances reduce the effectiveness of the operational search activity under consideration. Some areas of improvement of operational-investigative legislation are proposed
operational investigative activities, operational investigative measures, operational implementation, provocation, criminal proceedings
1. Borkov V. N. Provokaciya prestupleniya: ugolovno-pravovaya ocenka deystviy provokatora i sprovocirovannogo // Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2019. № 6. S. 68-74
2. Vagin O. A. Social'naya i pravovaya zashita lic, konfidencial'no sodeystvuyuschih operativnym apparatam kriminal'noy milicii : dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. M., 1997. 189 s
3. Zazhickiy V. I. Vstrechi operativnogo sotrudnika s podozrevaemym: kakimi oni dolzhny byt'? // Rossiyskaya yusticiya. 2015. № 1. S. 34-38
4. Mamatov V. G., Petrov S. P. Ob usovershenstvovanii otdel'nyh norm otechestvennogo zakonodatel'stva v celyah protivodeystviya prestupleniyam korrupcionnoy napravlennosti // Rossiyskiy sledovatel'. 2020. № 8. S. 42-47
5. Shkabin G. S. Obnaruzhenie umysla i provokaciya prestupleniya: problemy pravomernosti provedeniya operativno-rozysknyh meropriyatiy // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. № 11(102). S. 214-216
