Russian Federation
UDK 343.122 Потерпевшая сторона
In the criminal process, the methodology of legal regulation is determined by the appointment of state bodies and officials called upon to protect victims from crimes, as well as citizens from illegal and unjustified criminal prosecution. However, as the long-term practice of implementing the current mechanism of legal regulation of criminal procedural relations through the institution of compensation for harm to victims shows, the level of protection of these persons remains low. The origins of this problem are seen in the absence of a unified theoretical model and the quality of legislative technique. As a result of the conducted research, positive transformations in the criminal process of recent years have been identified – the figure of the victim of a crime is gradually becoming a key one in the context of the amendments made to the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in December 2018. But the improvement of the criminal procedure mechanism should not be a point, but a systematic reform of the goals, objectives and principles of all criminal procedure activities with an emphasis on the compensatory mechanism of legal regulation.
victim, compensation for harm, criminal procedural activity, legal regulation
1. Azarov, V. A. & Boyarskaya A. V. 2020, ‘Criminal procedure form: concept, properties, system’, Tomsk State University Journal of Law, iss. 37, pp. 5-20, doi:https://doi.org/10.17223/22253513/37/1.
2. Endoltseva, A. V., Endoltseva, Yu. V. & Platonova, N. I. 2019, ‘Basics of criminal policy: from theore cal discourse to de lege ferenda’, Russian Journal of Criminology, vol. 13, iss. 4, pp. 641-650, doi:https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255. 2019. 13(4). 641-650.
3. Lucyantsev, A. 2015, ‘On modern Civil law in Russia in the system of private law’, Terra Economic us, vol. 13, iss. 3.
4. Manova, N. S. & Baranova, M. A. 2019, ‘Principles of criminal proceedings as implementation of moral foundations of criminal procedural activities’, Perm University Herald, Juridical Sciences, iss. 45, pp. 567-570, doi:https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2019-45-564-593.
5. Ryabinina, T. K. 2020, ‘Institute of returning a criminal case to the prosecutor in the system of criminally-remedial means, ensuring the victim's right to protection from crime and access to justice’, Russian Journal of Criminology, vol. 14, iss. 3, pp. 512-526, doi:https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255. 2020. 14(3). 512- 526.
6. Trefilov, A. A. 2018, Strafprozessuale vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft, Moscow.
7. Vilkova, T. Y. & Maslennikova, L. N. 2019, ‘Legitimacy and Unification in Criminal Proceedings: from Procedural Document Forms to Electronic Criminal Case’, Perm University Herald, Juridical Sciences, iss. 46, pp. 728-751, doi:https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190- 2019-46-728-751.
8. Zaytsev, O. A. & Pastukhov, P. S. 2019, ‘Formation of a New Strategy for Crime Investigation in the Era of Digital Transformation’, Perm University Herald, Juridical Sciences, iss. 46, pp. 752-777, doi:https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2019-46-752-777.
9. Bezrukov S. S. Principy ugolovnogo processa : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2016. 58 s.
10. Vetrova G. N. O sootnoshenii celey i sredstv ih dostizheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti : sb. nauch. st. Tomsk, 2019. S. 14-21.
11. Vilkova T. Yu., Nasonov S. A. Princip uchastiya grazhdan v osuschestvlenii pravosudiya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve : monografiya. M., 2019. 261 s.
12. Gabov A. V., Golubcov V. G., Kuznecova O. A. Vstupitel'naya stat'ya // Metodologicheskie problemy civilisticheskih issledovaniy : sb. nauch. st. M., 2017. Vyp. 2. 610 s.
13. Grigor'ev V. N. O koncepcii kak forme predstavleniya rezul'tatov dissertacionnogo issledovaniya // Kriminologicheskiy zhurnal. 2006. № 2(10). S. 12-15.
14. Gus'kova A. V. Institut vozobnovleniya proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam vvidu novyh ili vnov' otkryvshihsya obstoyatel'stv kak voploschenie principov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva i kak otstuplenie ot nih // Al'manah' № 1: diskussionnye aspekty razvitiya i primeneniya ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva : sb. st. Kazan', 2018. S. 52-63.
15. Darovskih S. M. Sudebnye pravovye pozicii v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoreticheskie osnovy i processual'nye formy : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2011. 51 s.
16. Divaev A. B. Ponyatie i soderzhanie celi ugolovnogo processa (ugolovno-processual'nogo prava) // Pravovye problemy ukrepleniya rossiyskoy gosudarstvennosti : sb. st. Tomsk, 2019. S. 36-44.
17. Zaycev O. A. Gosudarstvennaya zaschita uchastnikov ugolovnogo processa. M. : Ek- zamen, 2002. 512 s.
18. Mischenko E. V. Problemy differenciacii i unifikacii ugolovno-processual'nyh form proizvodstv po otdel'nym kategoriyam ugolovnyh del : avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. M., 2014. 59 s.
19. Popov I. A. O nekotoryh principah rossiyskogo ugolovnogo processa na predvaritel'nom sledstvii i v sudebnom razbiratel'stve // Problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya i doznaniya : sb. nauch. tr. M., 2019. S. 80-83.
